Mladeč caves

Near Prague · Mladeč caves

How would I redate the carbon dated people from there, in my Creationist Calibration?

Direct AMS dating of the human fossils from Mladeč yielded uncalibrated dates of around 31,190 BP for Mladeč 1, 31,320 BP for Mladeč 2, 30,680 BP for Mladeč 8 and 26,330 BP for Mladeč 25c.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mlade%C4%8D_caves#Dating

Footnote 17 credits this information to:

Wild, Eva M.; et al. (2006). "Chapter 7: 14C dating of early Upper Palaeolithic human and faunal remains from Mladecˇ".
In Teschler-Nicola, Maria (ed.). Early Modern Humans at the Moravian Gate: The Mladecˇ Caves and their Remains. Springer-Verlag. ISBN 978-3-211-23588-1.

Now* for the redating, real dates and real skeleta as definition terms,** and inflated carbon dates as definition details:***

2935 BC

29,635 BC

Mladeč 2

29,320 BC

Mladeč 1

29,190 BC

Mladeč 8

28,680 BC

2912 BC

25,362

Mladeč 25c

24,330 BC

2890 BC

22,540 BC

The chief problem for my recalibration is Mladeč 2 getting as early as carbon dated 29,320 BC. This is very close to 2935 BC, just 22 years after the Flood, and who is dying that early? For Mladeč 1, a 17 year old girl, the problem is solved by her being born a few years after the Flood.

However, human bodies are not reed mats directly reflecting the CO2 from the atmosphere, and the calcium rich caves suggest they could have lived off things giving a real reservoir effect as well.

The alternatives are therefore:

• reservoir effect
• or the low 14C ratio (3.954 pmC for my 2935 BC) should remain somewhat longer than in my tables (or both).

Hans Georg Lundahl
Paris
St. Michael's Day
29.IX.2022

In monte Gargano venerabilis memoria beati Michaelis Archangeli, quando ipsius nomine ibi consecrata fuit Ecclesia, vili quidem facta schemate, sed caelesti praestans virtute.

* With some help from:
Creation vs. Evolution : New Tables
http://creavsevolu.blogspot.com/2020/08/new-tables.html

** Out to the left. *** Indented, starting further right.