Odd Perfect Numbers? Less Impossible than Abiogenesis or Evolutionary Origin of Human Language!

Correspondence of Hans Georg Lundahl: Tomasello Not Answering · New blog on the kid: How did human language "evolve from non-human"? · Assorted retorts from yahoo boards and elsewhere: Adam Reisman's Response, Mr. Flibble's Debate · Andrew Winkler's Response and Debate · Creation vs. Evolution: Odd Perfect Numbers? Less Impossible than Abiogenesis or Evolutionary Origin of Human Language!

Here is a mathematician asked by Veritasium how one could prove this, and the mathematician isn't anything like opting for the remote chance of finding one, he goes for a disproof, but apparently we aren't there yet:

What would a proof look like? Like how could we actually prove this?
23:15
- I think the main idea that people have been trying to approach this problem with is coming up with 23:21 more and more conditions odd perfect numbers have to satisfy, it's called this web 23:26 of conditions where it has to have 10 prime factors now that we know and maybe thousands 23:33 of non distinct prime factors and has to be bigger than 10 to the 3000. And it has to do all these different things 23:40 and we hope that eventually there's just so many conditions that can strain the numbers so much that they can't exist.

How likely is it that an odd perfect number exists? The smallest even perfect number is 6, the next one is 28. The smallest odd perfect number has recently been proven to be larger than 10²²⁰⁰, if it exists at all. I e, no odd perfect numbers can exist that are smaller than that, that is already disproven. Even so, Derek Muller on Veritasium and the Professor Pace Nielsen, Mathematics at Brigham Young University, whom he asked, are open to there being an odd perfect number. Though the professor is simply asking when the constraints are such that they cannot possibly be all of them fulfilled. He thinks it likely that could be proven, but at constraints already known pointing to a number larger than 10²²⁰⁰, he thinks we aren't there yet. Perhaps two conditions contradicting would be one way ...

Jonathan Sarfati on CMI and his pals over there, have basically made 100 hurdles of contradictory conditions for Abiogenesis.

I have made at least one or two hurdles of contradictory conditions for evolutionary emergence of language, and taken over one from Dominique Tassot on le CEP.

Emergence of new chromosomes and of new protein coding genes are other examples. Evolution does not work, not even if you give it Deep Time to "try."

So, if you are interested in a less daunting quest than proving Evolution possible, like trying to find an Odd Perfect Number. Then. Head over to:

The Oldest Unsolved Problem in Math
Veritasium | 8 March 2024
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zrv1EDIqHkY

Derek Muller is always pleasant company. Meanwhile, stop believing Evolution. And for Theistic Evolutionists, stop believing Adam had any non-human ancestry, whether direct or remote./HGL