But the guys behind "Catechism of the Catholic Church" do or did claim to be Pope, Cardinals, High Ranking theologians.
As to De Menezes' response: If Christ revealed this as truth, wouldn't He be able to explain it, so all could understand how it is possible and why it's important? She is still receiving "revelations" but gets no answers. The obvious reason is that the messages are false.
Quoting the Introibo blogger, a Sedevacantist Catholic, who unlike Patricia De Menezes doesn't agree aborted babies are martyrs.
Introibo Ad Altare Dei : Are Aborted Babies Martyrs?
https://introiboadaltaredei2.blogspot.com/2022/03/are-aborted-babies-martyrs.html
As I am not claiming to be a seer, it is not for me to show myself in contact with a Christ capable of resolving all doubts people around the Vatican may have about my defense of the actual Traditional Doctrine, namely that Adam was created near the beginning of the universe, less than 144 hours after God created Heaven and Earth.
As they are claiming to be representatives of the Church, it is for them to show themselves representing a Christ capable of resolving doubts around their claims, that ...
283 The question about the origins of the world and of man has been the object of many scientific studies which have splendidly enriched our knowledge of the age and dimensions of the cosmos, the development of life-forms and the appearance of man. These discoveries invite us to even greater admiration for the greatness of the Creator, prompting us to give him thanks for all his works and for the understanding and wisdom he gives to scholars and researchers. With Solomon they can say: "It is he who gave me unerring knowledge of what exists, to know the structure of the world and the activity of the elements. . . for wisdom, the fashioner of all things, taught me.
... and especially so, since they have actually taken King Solomon into the mix, who more or less claimed divine inspiration for his knowledge of the world. If modern scientists shared in that, why can't they give a clear response on how men, after gaining the genetical and anatomic wherewith to talk, gained speech? And if they can't, why is "the magisterium" claiming they shared in that?
Accept the account of the Bible as literally given in the text, as literally taken over the centuries by theologians, and the question of Adam's language is clear. Dismiss this as "too naive" or "we know better now" and you dig yourself into problems you can't resolve. And in case you think I have ones I can't resolve, at least in principle, why don't you challenge me on them? I am not a thought reader, I cannot know what exact nuance of my words gets lost or appears dubious for this or that person scrutinising my work.
The magisterium is not made up of seers, and yet, the genuine Catholic magisterium has been called "an oracle of God" - and that is not what I detect in the men who now quasi impose compromise with Old Earth and Evolutionary teachings.
Hans Georg Lundahl
Paris
Day after Annunciation
26.III.2022
PS, after reviewing Wisdom 7:17-22, it is possible that King Solomon had obtained, not inspired knowledge inaccessible to others, but a diligent presence of the knowledge available to all, on a pragmatic level, to the point of seeing "unforeseen" connexions and detecting hidden things. Even so, the modern scientist cannot claim the same for himself, he is all but diligent when touting Evolution and handwaving any objections to it with "we don't know that yet" .../HGL
PPS, it certainly involved seeing connexions between brewing process of beer and deeds of mercy - Ecclesiastes 11:1 Cast thy bread upon the running waters: for after a long time thou shalt find it again. - Sounds like a paradox, if the waters are running, they will carry off the bread, and as they are waters, they will make it moist and inedible ... until you realise that "the running waters" actually are in a basin, and that the specification means you can't use stagnant water, and that finding the bread again means finding liquid bread, aka beer, after the fermentation is done. But the formulation is chosen in relation to sth equally paradoxical - giving alms doesn't look like it's going to pay off, the one asking doesn't look like he's able to pay back, it's as instable as "running waters" on the wrong reading - but they are in God's basin of a fine brewery./HGL
PPPS - if you actually have a challenge and don't know under what post to put it in the comments, you can take a debate by mail, and it will be recycled on a blog of mine, if I'm not stopped from it:
Correspondence of Hans Georg Lundahl : If you wish to correspond with me
https://correspondentia-ioannis-georgii.blogspot.com/p/if-you-wish-to-correspond-with-me.html
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire