Evidence of Rising Carbon Levels

Emil Silvestru gives an example:

“The Cave Book” Featuring Dr Emil Silvestru (Interview Pt 2)
21st March 2012 | Creation Ministries International
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tWvXcrwYbJ8

Just after 3:00 he mentions an animal found in the permafrost in Yukon. A frozen musk ox was found in 1970.

Muscles on the back of the head: 24 000 years;
Hair: 17 000 years.

The musk ox would have lived 35 years.

What would be the ages in my table corresponding to 22 000 and 15 000 BC?

Creation vs. Evolution : New Tables
https://creavsevolu.blogspot.com/2020/08/new-tables.html

2890 B. Chr.

0.09274 pmC/100, so dated as 22 540 B. Chr.

2867 B. Chr.

0.119246 pmC/100, so dated as 20 467 B. Chr.

2845 B. Chr.

0.145681 pmC/100, so dated as 18 745 B. Chr.

2823 B. Chr.

0.172045 pmC/100, so dated as 17 373 B. Chr.

2800 B. Chr.

0.198337 pmC/100, so dated as 16 150 B. Chr.

2778 B. Chr.

0.224559 pmC/100, so dated as 15 128 B. Chr.

2890 to 2778 BC. 112 years. A bit more than the 35 years of a musk ox.

How could this be explained?

• musk oxes lived longer that time after the Flood than now (I mean, the beginning is 67 years after the Flood, and human lifespans were much longer for those born then)
• the muscles had more of a reservoir effect due to some ingestion of carbon already old in the lifetime of the musk ox
• the hair had a contamination effect, carbon 14 higher due to closeness to some Uranium source
• my tables are wrong and the musk ox lived when carbon 14 was rising quicker than I account for.

These are the choices./HGL