Feel free to reprint and to edit collections of my essays! (link to conditions)
"La vérité et l'érudition, en effet, ne sauraient être hérétiques, au point de redouter d'utiliser ce que des érudits, même hérétiques, ont écrit et exposé avec justesse". (Dom Guarin)
Pages
- Accueil
- Blogs by same author
- Un blog a été donné à vos étudiants.
- Where You Looking For Something Else?
- Apologetics Section
- Can we get this straight? I never said I was atheist up to becoming Catholic
- Weakness of CMI : Church History
- A Catholic who will go unnamed
- Reading this on iPad?
- Dixit Aquinas
- Are All Responses to CMI Here?
- What is a Miracle? What Does it Take?
- Link to Haydock Comment
- My Carreer Shouldn't Depend on Merriam Webster Spelling
jeudi 16 juillet 2020
Sobekemhat instead of Imhotep? Sesostris III instead of Djoser?
Sobekemhat instead of Imhotep? Sesostris III instead of Djoser? · Checked Since Yesterday
Off the bat, while listening to Douglas Petrovich, this sounds like a strain on carbon buildup between Genesis 14 and Joseph in Egypt, plus a very stable carbon level from Joseph in Egypt to Exodus.
I prefer the idea that Sesostris III was the child killer, Amenemhat III the Pharao whose daughter picked up Moses, and Amenemhat IV* (who has no full grave but a cenotaph) was Moses. That is the hypothesis on which I model the carbon build up. I may try a modelling on this one later, tonight I am short of time.
Hans Georg Lundahl
Paris
Our Lady of Mount Carmel
16.VII.2020
* Credits to David Down, this article:
Searching for Moses
by David Down | This article is from
Journal of Creation 15(1):53–57, April 2001
https://creation.com/searching-for-moses
Inscription à :
Publier les commentaires (Atom)
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire