Dinosaurs and Men, Same Time? Yes!

Same place? No.

Men and sharks, men and rhinos, men and hyaenas don't live in the same exact places today.

I think men back before the Flood were as savvy as wanting to avoid this kind of company.

As to the exception, the Ark probably had juvenile samples of the bigger dinos, and when it comes to dinosaur kinds, if Giganotosaurus and T. Rex were the same kind, God perhaps preferred putting the smaller T. Rex on the Ark as well as putting just juvenile still small specimina on it.

But before and after the Flood, men and dinos didn't live together, like we and rhinos don't live together.

Now, this is borne out from where they are found. Note, part of my solution depends on dino bones having been found basically where the dino lived. This is disputed by lots of Creationists.

Here is an example they sometimes give: if a boulder can be found 500 km from the rock it came from, why would a dino bone not be 500 km from where the dino lived?

To which I answer: that boulder arguably lost half or more of its volume along the way. Doing that is OK for remaining a boulder. It's not OK for remaining a well articulated dino skeleton. Yes, we have some of those.

So, could you refute my position?

Well, pure Neanderthals and Denisovans as well as their half caste offspring, they were, if you ask me, pre-Flood.

So, if you found a Neanderthal cave, actually with Neanderthals in it (buried or killed suddenly) and you find, below that, an animal that man couldn't live along, you'd have refuted me, they couldn't both be from the Flood. So, Want to Live Close to Giant Dragonflies? Nah, Me Neither · Acknowledgement to Jerome Cohen for Previous · Creswell Crag and Bolsover. There was a Giant Dragonfly, but the nearest cave of pre-historic men was c. 1 mile away, and that one was not a Neanderthal one./HGL