Complex Writing Didn't Exist Among Hebrews? Theory Before Ebla Was Discovered (Check the Video)

There is No Reading Public? · Complex Writing Didn't Exist Among Hebrews? Theory Before Ebla Was Discovered (Check the Video)

Exploring the Ebla Tablets and Their Shocking Genesis Connections
Flying Eagle Publications | 8 Aug. 2025
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9m_jk5FVqp0

It could be added on the issue, however, that the date of the Ebla tablets are in carbon dates 2400 to 2200 BC. This would be Third Millennium if corresponding to real dates. However, in my tables, this translates to, roughly:

1656 BC*

91.353 pmC, dated as 2404 BC

1634 BC

93.251 pmC, dated as 2212 BC

A bit more than a century before the Exodus in 1510 BC. However, this is sufficient for Moses to have had writing before 600 BC, when it is pretended Hebrews were first exposed to writing. However, so is Proto-Sinaitic, which corresponds to the Hebrew alphabet and comes from a region he knew.

The date of the inscriptions** is mostly placed in the 17th or 16th century BC.[30] An alternative view dates most of the inscriptions to the reign of Amenemhat III or his successor circa 1800 BC.[31] It has been suggested that the dating period includes the reign of pharaoh Senwosret III.[32]

This corresponds very well to the theory that Moses was born around the death of Sesostris III, was co-regent with his "mother/sister" as Amememhet IV before he had to leave Egypt, which explains why Amememhet IV had a cenotaph, and that's my basis for table V—VI and VI—VI/VII or rather the limit VI between them. Between VI and VII in previous tables, I have inserted a VI/VII corresponding to the Exodus itself, so that's 40 years after the disappearance of Moses as Amemehet IV. And no, for the Middle Kingdom, we don't have a documentation all that brilliant that the squeezing of time lines can be excluded./HGL

PPS, some have quibbled about Genesis 14. The same channel has a video about Elamite, Chedorlaomer and Genesis 14:

Has archaeology proved Genesis 14 is a lie?
Flying Eagle Publications | 1 Oct. 2023
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4vdbRIMVpkk

Now, one key, I think, is that Genesis 14 happened in 1935 BC or close enough, based on Abraham born in 2015 BC, but Genesis 14 is tied by the verse about Amorrhites in Asason-Tamar to the archeology of En-Geddi where the only or latest possible relevant habitation ended in carbon dated 3500 BC, meaning, the carbon 14 level was 82.763 pmC*** — before any known writing. The Awan dynasty is the earliest Elamite dynasty for which we have names, and it starts (if carbon dated!) in the soujourn. Meanwhile, Genesis 14 falls during the Susa II period. Before there are written records in Proto-Elamite./HGL

PPPS, the Susa II period is from carbon dated 3800–3100 BC.° /HGL

* Citation from Newer Tables, Joseph in Egypt to Fall of Troy and it's on the table of V—VI, between the death of Joseph's pharao and the birth of Moses around the time when Sesostris III, the child killing pharao died. Note, 91.353 pmC isn't what you find now in the samples, it's what the atmosphere held back then. If we translate the percentage fraction to a decimal fraction and insert it in the right place, here is the equation:

5730 years * log(0.91353) / log(0.5) = 748 years

And if we add that to the actual BC year, we get the carbon year:

748 (extra) years + 1656 (actual) BC = 2404 (carbon dated) BC

** https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proto-Sinaitic_script

*** 5730 years * log(0.82763) / log(0.5) + 1935 BC = 3499 BC, citation of carbon level from Newer Tables, Flood to Joseph in Egypt, anchor point IV.

° https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Susa#Susa_II_and_Uruk_influence_(3800—3100_BC)