If natural nuclear fission reactors existed deep inside the earth, in the core or/and in the mantle, there is no particular reason why they could not have a pulsating character, periodic or random. It is conceivable that during pulses, massive neutrino fluxes were produced which could have then affected radioactive decay rates of all radioisotopes on the planet.
This is from one of four articles on radioactive decay rate variations I was reading with great interest on CMI.
I will first list them:
- Variable radioactive decay rates and the changes in solar activity
by Andrew Sibley
http://creation.com/radioactive-decay-rates-and-solar-activity - Radioactive decay rate depends on chemical environment
by Tas Walker
http://creation.com/radioactive-decay-rate-depends-on-chemical-environment - Billion-fold acceleration of radioactivity demonstrated in laboratory
by John Woodmorappe
http://creation.com/billion-fold-acceleration-of-radioactivity-demonstrated-in-laboratory - Neutrinos—the not-so-neutral particles
by Emil Silvestru
http://creation.com/neutrinos-not-so-neutral
What exactly was I saying about atomic warfare in the Nodian pre-Flood society, a few months or perhaps even a year ago? I was saying for instance such bombs may have accelerated decay rates very substantially for pre-Flood radioactive samples.
Whence my interest in Mahabharata poem as having possibly sth to do with warfare when Kali Yuga is supposed to have begun, i e 155 years before the Flood (if we date it by Roman Martyrology).
In other words, Hindoo Mahabharata freaks if succeeding in proving atom bombs existed and were used thousands of years ago, would be doing Young Earth Creationism a big favour. Perhaps not a necessary one, but still a big one.
For the reason stated by Emil Silvestru in the quote above.
Of course, there is this other take on very old ages by very long half lives - that they have not been tested as to the Geiger measurer ticking rate per se and calculated half life from there but rather calibrated half lives from old samples. I am not speaking as an expert here, but I am noting that something like that was done when a mummy supposed to have been historically dated was used to calibrate C14. As already noted on the three parts of the fifth part of a series that also includes messages here:
- 5) New blog on the kid : Quarterlife is a Bad Term
- 5b) Assorted retorts from yahoo boards and elsewhere : Answering Bill Nye, the Science Guy on a few points
- 5c) New blog on the kid : Phil Provaznik/Dalrymple on Potassium-Argon and on Principle, more on Fission Track and Isochrons (a debunking of...)
Take it as a suggestion. I have found consistent or near such mutism towards non-specialists among specialists of today, when adressing the essays to them and challenging for refutations if they have such. So I cannot claim to know for a fact exactly how it is claculated, but these are my musings on the matter.
Hans Georg Lundahl
Nanterre UL
St Sabbas, Abbot
5-XII-2014
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire