Feel free to reprint and to edit collections of my essays! (link to conditions)
"La vérité et l'érudition, en effet, ne sauraient être hérétiques, au point de redouter d'utiliser ce que des érudits, même hérétiques, ont écrit et exposé avec justesse". (Dom Guarin)
Pages
- Accueil
- Blogs by same author
- Un blog a été donné à vos étudiants.
- Where You Looking For Something Else?
- Apologetics Section
- Can we get this straight? I never said I was atheist up to becoming Catholic
- Weakness of CMI : Church History
- A Catholic who will go unnamed
- Reading this on iPad?
- Dixit Aquinas
- Are All Responses to CMI Here?
- What is a Miracle? What Does it Take?
- Link to Haydock Comment
- My Carreer Shouldn't Depend on Merriam Webster Spelling
mercredi 11 mai 2016
I was going to make next post on Plato, but today's article in CMI posed a simple question to my mind
1) I was going to make next post on Plato, but today's article in CMI posed a simple question to my mind · 2) And Speaking of Inconsistent Exegesis ...
Here is article:
CMI : Creation—how did God do it?
by Russell M. Grigg
http://creation.com/creation-how-did-god-do-it
Here is the simple question: if people say that though God spoke and it was could refer to "it was"/"became" over the millions of years it took, with the means it took according to what they consider a naturalistic scenario, does that mean they believe that, when Jesus said "I will, be thou made clean," and when the result is reported as "And forthwith his leprosy was cleansed," it really was a six month cure of antibiotics, a now known leprosy cure, which took place?/HGL
Inscription à :
Publier les commentaires (Atom)
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire