You Find a Fossil Whale Here, a Fossil Pterosaur There ...

Creation vs. Evolution : How Much was Shinar Devastated by the Flood? · You Find a Fossil Whale Here, a Fossil Pterosaur There ... · Answering Carter and Cosner on Eden · Trying to Break Down "Reverse Danube" or "Reverse Euphrates" Concept · Correspondence of Hans Georg Lundahl : With Damien Mackey on Four Rivers and Related, I to X · Continuing Previous, XI to XX - are Nile Rivers Excluded? · Continuing Previous : XXI to XXXIII - getting to Troy (as we Tend to Do)

If boulders of stone have been transported over 500 km, why should fossils tell us exactly where the animal lived?

Well, a stone that has been transported over 500 km might be huge, but it is probably lots smaller than it started out as.

A skeleton which has been transported over 500 km during the Flood ... I don't think there are many recognisable parts of it.

So, if a place in Tyrol has a Pterosaur, Linz has a whale, a place called Nussdorf just outside Vienna has both a whale and a seal, well, the fossils have been recognised. This means chances are they were buried before they had time to get transported far away.

And that means, a place in Tyrol was land or an island, Vienna was sea shore, Linz was sea in pre-Flood times./HGL