Here I have rebooted the last table I gave Ussher's chronology. Namely with other BC years for Biblical chronology.
And inserted a few hints about how fitting or less fitting this chronology would be:
- I 2957 BC
- 2.142 pmc, + 31 800 years, 34757 BC
- II 2803 BC
- 25.609 pmc, + 11 250 years, 14053 BC
- III 2650 BC
- 40.195 pmc, + 7550 years, 10200 BC
- Low feature in Göbekli Tepe
- 9559 BP, 7609 BC
- IV 2496 BC
- 54.721 pmc, + 5000 years, 7496 BC
- High Feature in Göbekli Tepe
- 8430 BP, 6480 BC
- V 2343 BC
- 63.751 pmc, + 3700 years, 6043 BC
- VI 2189 BC
- 72.689 pmc, + 2650 years, 4839 BC
- VII 2036 BC
- 78.256 pmc, + 2050 years, 4086 BC
- Ur of Woolley starts
- a little before Birth of Abraham
- Narmer's raw carbon date
- before 3332, around Birth of Isaac
- VIII 1882 BC
- 83.844 pmc, + 1450 years, 3332 BC
- IX 1728 BC
- 87.316 pmc, + 1100 years, 2828 BC
- Date of Joseph
- is close to a raw carbon date of Djoser
- X 1575 BC
- 90.665 pmc, + 810 years, 2385 BC
- Exodus (1510 BC)
- would carbon date between 2385 and 2041, if we had a trace of it.
- XI 1421 BC
- 92.752 pmc, + 620 years, 2041 BC
- XII 1268 BC
- 94.992 pmc, + 430 years, 1698 BC
- Trojan War Date 1190 BC
- falls between 1114 and 1268 BC, which means the carbon date would be between 1424 and 1698 BC. Could we be dealing with Troy V?
- XIII 1114 BC
- 96.376 pmc, + 310 years, 1424 BC
- Both Troy dates (VIh and VIIa)
- from Hisarlik fall between 961 BC and 1114 BC, since carbon dated between 1171 BC and 1424 BC.
- XIV 961 BC
- 97.486 pmc, + 210 years, 1171 BC
- XV 807 BC
- 98.188 pmc, + 150 years, 957 BC
- XVI 654 BC
- 99.298 pmc, + 60 years, 714 BC
- XVII 500 BC
- 100 pmc, no extra years, 500 BC
The greatest weakness of this idea is perhaps introducing Troy V as the Troy of Priam. I don't know any archaeologist who suggests that.
So, on this view, either Trojan War would be a myth, or a chronologically displaced story, or we need to look harder at possible traces of destruction in Troy V - and I don't think looking other places than Hissarlik is a great option.
Hans Georg Lundahl
ut supra
(or, as seen on blog : ut infra).
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire