Flood to Abraham, Syncellus A, and a Problem

Our Lord being in Syncellus born the precise year of 5500 anno mundi, this give the following years from Flood to Abraham - in his chronology:

5500
2242 Diluvium
3258 BC (Flood)

5500
2736 Opificium turris Babylon
2764 BC (starting to build the tower "of Babylon")

5500
2771 Phalec nascitur
2729 BC (Peleg born)

5500
2776 Linguarum confusio et gentium dispersio
2724 BC (Confusion of tongues and dispersion of nations)

5500 / 5500
3311 / 3312 Abraham nascitur
2189 / 2188 BC (Abraham is born)

But this means that Abraham in En Gedi would have been ...

3311
0080
3391

5500
3391
2109 BC.

So we have the four points here:

3258 BC - Flood
2764 BC - Tower of Babel Starts
2724 BC - Confusion of Tongues
2109 BC - Abraham in En Gedi

The second point may (A) or may not (B) coincide with beginning of Göbekli Tepe ("9600 BC"), while the confusion of tongues would coincide with or precede the abandonment of Göbekli Tepe ("8600 BC"). Here we will deal with case A, all of Göbekli Tepe taking only 40 years.

Outline

3258 BC - Flood

1.688 pmc, + 33700 years, 37000 BC

2764 BC - Tower of Babel Starts

43.739 pmc, + 6850 years, 9600 BC

2724 BC - Confusion of Tongues

49.125 pmc !, + 5876 years, 8600 BC

2109 BC - Abraham in En Gedi

85.541 pmc, + 1291 years, 3400 BC

3258 BC - Flood

1.688 pmc, + 33700 years, 37000 BC

3225 BC

10.987 pmc, + 18250 years, 21475 BC

3192 BC

18.196 pmc, + 14100 years, 17292 BC

3159 BC

23.943 pmc, + 11800 years, 14959 BC

3126 BC

28.399 pmc, + 10400 years, 13526 BC

3093 BC

31.951 pmc, + 9450 years, 12543 BC

3060 BC

34.705 pmc, + 8750 years, 11810 BC

3027 BC

36.9 pmc, + 8250 years, 11277 BC

2995 BC

38.601 pmc, + 7850 years, 10845 BC

2962 BC

39.958 pmc, + 7600 years, 10562 BC

2929 BC

41.011 pmc, + 7350 years, 10279 BC

2896 BC

41.849 pmc, + 7200 years, 10096 BC

2863 BC

42.497 pmc, + 7050 years, 9913 BC

2830 BC

43.017 pmc, + 6950 years, 9780 BC

2797 BC

43.421 pmc, + 6900 years, 9697 BC

2764 BC (starting to build Babel)

43.739 pmc, + 6850 years, 9614 BC

Above, formulas

(43.739-1.688)/22.245

=1.89035738368172623061362103843560350640593391773432

multiply by the Fibonacci serial factors, add back 1.688

3258-2764=494

494/15=32.9333333333333333

Below, formulas

2724-2109=615

615/15=41

(85.541-49.125)/22.245

=1.6370420319172847830973252416273319847156664419

multiply by the Fibonacci serial factors, add back 49.125

2724 BC

49.125 pmc, + 5876 years, 8600 BC

2683 BC

57.178 pmc, + 4600 years, 7283 BC

2642 BC

63.421 pmc, + 3750 years, 6392 BC

2601 BC

68.398 pmc, + 3150 years, 5751 BC

2560 BC

72.256 pmc, + 2700 years, 5260 BC

2519 BC

75.332 pmc, + 2350 years, 4869 BC

2478 BC

77.718 pmc, + 2100 years, 4578 BC

2437 BC

79.618 pmc, + 1900 years, 4337 BC

2396 BC

81.092 pmc, + 1750 years, 4146 BC

2355 BC

82.267 pmc, + 1600 years, 3955 BC

2314 BC

83.179 pmc, + 1500 years, 3814 BC

2273 BC

83.904 pmc, + 1450 years, 3723 BC

2232 BC

84.465 pmc, + 1400 years, 3632 BC

2191 BC

84.916 pmc, + 1350 years, 3541 BC

2150 BC

85.266 pmc, + 1300 years, 3450 BC

2109 BC

85.541 pmc, + 1300 years, 3409 BC

As you may have noted, between beginning and end of Göbekli Tepe, there is a rapid rise in radiocarbon. This may be an asset, if this coincides with the Younger Dryas.

Note, the Younger Dryas impact hypothesis is controversial:

The Younger Dryas impact hypothesis or Clovis comet hypothesis originally proposed that a large air burst or earth impact of one or more comets initiated the Younger Dryas cold period about 12,900 BP calibrated (10,900 ¹⁴C uncalibrated) years ago. The hypothesis has been contested by research showing that most of the conclusions cannot be repeated by other scientists, and criticized because of misinterpretation of data and the lack of confirmatory evidence.

10,900 ¹⁴C uncalibrated years ago? Well, uncalibrated carbon years is precisely what these tables are for. And 10 900 BP = 8950 BC.

The problem is that ... my Göbekli Tepe dates are actually calibrated dates. I'd have needed uncalibrated ones. Also, if it is calibrated 9000 BC, it will not coincide with uncalibrated 9000 BC.

Hans Georg Lundahl
Nanterre UL
Thursday in Ember
Week of Lent
9.III.2017